RE:[sap-log-mm] MNFR (manufacturer account group) mandatory fields

Posted by Sap Land Saturday, 30 July 2011 15:31 0 comments

Posted by PeterDahl
on Jul 30 at 7:32 PM
Paul, yes, I think so ... while the Material Master does not define vendors ... it does use - in the Purchasing tab - Manufacturers. Manufacturers are, unfortunately, a subset of the Vendor Master (account type MNFR).

I need to get several hundred (or more) Manufacturers set up for my Material Masters ... and that means getting a template that defines the "absolutely mandatory" fields for defining a Manufacturer.

One thing I am NOT in the slightest interested in is actual Vendors ... for some strange reason the client has left that task completely in the Financial tracks jurisdiction.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Peter Dahl
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: MNFR (manufacturer account group) mandatory fields

folks, I've finally managed to get the ear of the right people to get proper Manufacturer master data created in the Vendor Master.
Hopefully someone can help -- currently I have only the Vendor Master template we've been using for Purchasing Vendors. That template doesn't define the mandatory fields required for MNFR records.
As I recall, this is a skeleton that merely helps to provide a single ID for each manufacturer that we need for Material Master and Equipment Master records.
Can someone point me to where I can find the Mandatory/Optional data required to complete a MNFR record?
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com Groups Discussions Support BBCode. Share Code Snippets with Peers
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Ship To address changes (so --> outbound delivery)

Posted by Sap Land 14:11 0 comments

Posted by Typewriter
on Jul 30 at 6:14 PM
Hi Marc,

After much testing (and reading theory), I have got it.

With regards to changes done in the Street address of SH To in a sales order, there are 2 PARTS.

Part 1 - Changes do NOT come through -
You have created a sales order, then created a delivery.
In table VBPA, Address indication for WE is Dand address # is say 83630 .

Now you go to VA02, Header level, Tab Partners, change Street / House number. Save sales order.
In VL02N, check the delivery SH To address - there is NO change. (it remains the original)
In table VBPA, Address indication for WE is now E and address # is say 9000000748 .


Part 2 - Changes do come through -
You have created a sales order, then in VA02 you change the SH To information (Street / House #). Then created a delivery.
In table VBPA, Address indication for WE is E and address # is say 9000000749.
The delivery shall have the changed SH To information.

Then you go to VA02, AGAIN change the SH To address (i.e. Change2) in the sales order. Go to VL02N, you shall see that Change2 has automatically come through to the delivery.

So, in part 2, when ever you change SH To address in your sales order, the change shall be automatically updated in your delivery.
The reason for this is - in my understanding -
In table VBPA, Address indication for WE is E and address # is STILL 9000000749. Thus system is checking E and 900000749 both are same as before, thus NO delivery split, NO problem; the SH To with change2 is transferred from sales order to the delivery.

When SAP consultants did tests in accordance to Part 1, there was no automatic change in SH To address is delivery. That is correct.

I suggest - for this particular case - you delete the delivery and after doing changes in your order, create a new delivery. The changes shall come through.
After that any number of changes done in the sales order, those shall come through to your delivery. (Of course all this is with condition that invoice is not yet created, as discussed earlier)

Regards,
Typewriter

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Typewriter
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 12:05 PM
Subject: Ship To address changes (so --> outbound delivery)

Hi experts,

Recently in SD forum there was a query -
A sales order and outbound delivery are created. User then goes to the sales order (in VA02), in header level, Tab Partners; he changes the Street/House number of Ship To.

Shall these changes made in the sales order then go through to the (already created) delivery? (i.e. street/house number of SH To at header level).

I had tested this a few days back and the changes were going through to the delivery. But testing it recently, the changes are not going through to delivery. I do not understand why this change in test results.

http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-sd/address-change-in-already-billed-sales-order-4325471#M4339163

Please help,
Typewriter
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Ship To address changes (so --> outbound delivery)

Posted by Sap Land 08:11 0 comments

Posted by Typewriter
on Jul 30 at 12:04 PM
Hi experts,

Recently in SD forum there was a query -
A sales order and outbound delivery are created. User then goes to the sales order (in VA02), in header level, Tab Partners; he changes the Street/House number of Ship To.

Shall these changes made in the sales order then go through to the (already created) delivery? (i.e. street/house number of SH To at header level).

I had tested this a few days back and the changes were going through to the delivery. But testing it recently, the changes are not going through to delivery. I do not understand why this change in test results.

http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-sd/address-change-in-already-billed-sales-order-4325471#M4339163

Please help,
Typewriter
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] 30 C movement not happening in the system

Posted by Sap Land 06:34 0 comments

Posted by stonehenge
on Jul 30 at 11:15 AM
Hi gurus,

I am not able to map the 30 C movement in the system through MIGO. The 30 A has worked fine through ME2ON. Can you help out?


Regards,
Anindya
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com Marketplace: Take online training courses in SAP and other specialized areas of business and IT.
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Contract versus Info record

Posted by Sap Land 06:25 0 comments

Posted by stonehenge
on Jul 30 at 11:14 AM
Hi HT,


If that is the case how would you think would costing get affected for such materials?
Regards,
Anindya

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Ha Tran
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 6:22 PM
Subject: Contract versus Info record

Hi,

No, it is not feasible as once your contract is referred, all data will be defaulted from the contract instead of info record.

Cheers,
HT
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Transit good recording method

Posted by Sap Land 03:38 0 comments

Posted by mairymano (Software Engineer)
on Jul 30 at 10:43 AM
Hi Mahboub,

There is another solution:
1. You can make a storage location named as "in Transit" (temporary
location).
2. When goods are on shipping, receive the vehicles in "in Transit", this
will help to monitor the quantity in shipping.
3. Receive the material in your warehouse when you receive actually.


--

Best Regards,

Humaira Aslam Chughtai
SAP MM Consultant
ICI Paints, Pakistan

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Mohamad Mahboub
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Transit good recording method

Hi,

I'm from Egypt and I work in Automotive industry as an costing accountant, we buy vehicles from many foreign countries but we only record the goods receipt when units physically arrives at the warehouse, although ownership of these units are from shipping date. How can I record the ownership while it's onboard.

All of you are doing a very good help.

Thanks and best regards,
Mohamad Mahboub
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Return of MPN material back to vendor

Posted by Sap Land 00:56 0 comments

Posted by ericdemo
on Jul 30 at 10:04 AM
Try the mm notes by martin-murray; it will help you.
Just google it and you will get it.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Vaishali gupta
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 1:33 PM
Subject: Return of MPN material back to vendor

Hi all,

I am trying to do a return of MPN configured materials. Please throw some light on how it can be done.

Any help wold be greatly appreciated.

Regards.
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
View the "Managing the Application Life Cycle" webinar and learn how organizations optimize their SAP applications.
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Is there a way to automate the tax code assignation on non PO documents like Contracts-inforecords,Scheduling agreement

Posted by Sap Land Friday, 29 July 2011 23:14 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Jul 30 at 9:47 AM
Hi Hernan,

The fact is that the automatic tax code determination (through the usage of so-call tax indicator) will only be used for the purchase order. It is not designed to be used for purchasing master data record such as contract or info record. Therefore, the only workaround solution is to use BAdI for your contract or info record.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Hernan Enriquez
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 2:03 PM
Subject: Is there a way to automate the tax code assignation on non PO documents like Contracts-inforecords,Scheduling agreement

I'm looking for a way to automate the tax code assignation on purchases, I'm aware of the condition techniques for POs, but I would like to understand if it can be also applied to the other document in purchases so we can have a totally automate process on tax code assignation.
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Return to Vendor

Posted by Sap Land 23:11 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Jul 30 at 9:45 AM
Hi Muthu,

Unfortunately, I don't agree upon your suggestion as 161 movement type will only be used when the return PO is used.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Wim van der Lee
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:37 AM
Subject: Return to Vendor

In the normal Gr process with movement type 101 we can do a return delivery with movement type 122.

We are using movement type 107 and 109 is there a movement type return to Vendor after the Goods Receipt is done with 109.

Thanks for your help.

Kr W
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
View the "Managing the Application Life Cycle" webinar and learn how organizations optimize their SAP applications.
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Material master error in accounting view

Posted by Sap Land 23:10 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Jul 30 at 9:45 AM
Hi,

Did you activate material ledger feature in your system? What was the error message number? How was this error populated?

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Heryanto .
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 4:25 AM
Subject: Material master error in accounting view

Dear experts,

I have a problem in material master. When I ticked accounting1, accounting2, costing1, costing2 view, system displayed error "Error reading price table CKMLPR for material ?.". How to solve this? Is there a program that must be executed ?

Tkanks in advance.

Heryanto.
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
View the "Managing the Application Life Cycle" webinar and learn how organizations optimize their SAP applications.
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] 701 movement took place in spite of no inventory difference

Posted by Sap Land 23:08 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Jul 30 at 9:45 AM
Hi,

Can you rephrase your inquiry? Does it mean PID was posted even though there has not been any count difference? How was your PID count difference posted? Was it via standard transaction MI07?

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: jagamohan Panigrahi
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:05 AM
Subject: 701 movement took place in spite of no inventory difference

701 movement took place in spite of no inventory difference.
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Share Knowledge About SAP Scripting. Join the Discussion Group
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Transit good recording method

Posted by Sap Land 21:05 0 comments

Posted by Haresh TM
on Jul 30 at 1:20 AM
Hi Mohamad,
You can make po without gr tick and do the IV and GR at the time of actual receipts.

Regards,

Haresh TM

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Mohamad Mahboub
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Transit good recording method

Hi,

I'm from Egypt and I work in Automotive industry as an costing accountant, we buy vehicles from many foreign countries but we only record the goods receipt when units physically arrives at the warehouse, although ownership of these units are from shipping date. How can I record the ownership while it's onboard.

All of you are doing a very good help.

Thanks and best regards,
Mohamad Mahboub
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
_.____.__

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Designed by vnbloggers

Hosted by SapLand