RE:[sap-log-mm] GI for Movement Types

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on Dec 10 at 10:11 PM
Hi,

If this is the update of the moving average price of the material, then the stock movement won't help fix your problem. You will have to adjust your MAP via MR21 transaction.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Nely Fernandez
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 8:49 PM
Subject: GI for Movement Types

Hi Folks,

We are updating our inventory in the system for 2011. We want to remove inventory value from prior years which is physically seen. The entry should be Retained Earnings.
What is the movement type (MIGO) to be use for GI?
Where in OBYC the default acct assignment for GL entry RE.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Nely

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
SAP BusinessObjects: Dashboards and Analytics. Learn more about this Toobox.com Marketplace online course.

_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Business Objects and PM

Posted by a911sc
on Dec 10 at 3:17 PM
I have been asked to help the Business Objects group get SAP PM data BOBJ.

Does anyone have any experience with defining the tables and fields for BOBJ data extraction?

Paul Dornburg
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  

_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] PR Without Classification

Posted by Shanthakumarreddy
on Dec 10 at 10:44 AM
Hi Athulla

Release strategy w/o classification for pr means that itemwise release in
the pr.

Whereas with classification meant for overall pr release.

Hope it's clear now.

Shanthakumar G Reddy

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Mohammed Athaulla
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:47 AM
Subject: PR Without Classification

Can any one tell me the brief procedure how to work with release strategy for pr without classification and what's the difference b/w with and with out classification for PR?

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
SAP BusinessObjects: Dashboards and Analytics. Learn more about this Toobox.com Marketplace online course.

_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] RFQ Correction Based on Collective Number

Posted by BHEL-TRICHY (ABAP)
on Dec 10 at 10:25 AM
After creating RFQs are in ME41, if I want to make a change, then I am forced to open every RFQ of the collective no in ME42 and do the change. If the corrections are too many and vendors are many, then there are every chance of doing a mistake. If RFQs are sent with errors by mistake to vendors and noticed after tender opening, then it will call for cancellation of tender. Is there a way for simultaneous correction of RFQs based on collective no?
Regards,
mohan
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com for iPhone & Android: Ask Questions & Get Answers Anywhere. Download the Free App

_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Prevent Invoice from Saving when Tolerance Exceeded

Posted by satishvp123
on Dec 10 at 10:20 AM
This works in two stages. In the first stage you define tolerances, which apparently you have done.
In the second stage, you set the resultant system message as warning / error. (You seem to need it as error message.) Message examples are M8 081, M8 082, M8 083, etc.
Regards,
Satish

---------------Original Message---------------
From: imsoqt610
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:57 AM
Subject: Prevent Invoice from Saving when Tolerance Exceeded

Hi Experts!

We have an urgent requirement regarding posting invoices in MIRO.

The business wants to prevent the invoice to be saved if the IR Qty and IR Amount exceeds the GR Tolerance quantity.

Example:
I have Purchase Order for Material A. PO Qty is 100 kg, 100 USD/kg = net amount 10,000 USD. And overdelivery tolerance in the PO is 10%.

When I post invoice (IR before GR for Foreign PO), the IR Qty I entered is 111 KG, IR Amount is 11,100 -- which exceeds the 10% tolerance.

Is there a way that we can block the posting of the invoice? Not the blocked for payment, we want to disallow the users to save the invoice document once the IR Qty and IR Amount exceeds the tolerance.

Can this be done via LIV Set Tolerance check?

Thanks in advance!

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
satishvp123
SAP Logistics Material Management Helper

Posted helpful replies on 5 threads in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Have an SAP Question? Ask Your Peers at Toolbox for IT

_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

Posted by BHEL-TRICHY (ABAP)
on Dec 10 at 9:35 AM
Hi Sheshanarayana,
We are doing the same here. But that creates confusion as the hard copy and system screen do not match. If purchase is going to see the standard SAP screen and discuss with vendor, then it's gone. We find it difficult to educate Stores who find it difficult to correlate with actual receipt, Deliver challan and system data in MIGO. Do we have to live with this problem? Every year we are dealing with more than 3000 POs annually and confusion prevails and we were very eager when someone told that this problem is addressed in ECC6 EHP5. If the option is avl in PO at least, we will be happy.

Regards,
k.mohan

---------------Original Message---------------
From: mohan KARUPPIAH
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:43 AM
Subject: Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

We want to combine the requirements of Multiple Account Assignment in a Single Purchase Requisition Line Item for a material code identified as "Individual(Q)" in material master. We are in 4.7 Version. System does not allow. We are planning to upgrade to ECC 6.0 EHP 5. Is this provision available in the new version? Please confirm.

Thanks,
mohan

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Have you explored the Toolbox.com Marketplace? Learn more and access a free course now.

_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

Posted by sheshn (DGM)
on Dec 10 at 12:27 AM
Hi,

We at BEL also faced the same situation. This has been
addressed by consolidating the PO lines of same material code in the
Output Smartform so that the Vendor will be seeing a single line.
While making GR, the qty recvd has to be allocated to individual
line,

The other way is to use WBS based prodn instead of sale
order based in which case the consolidation happens in PR stage itself.

Regards
Sheshanarayana

>

>
> For a material that is being inventorised, the demand is
available for
> multiple WBS. MRP provides Purchase Requisition
for each WBS separately.
> Unable to achieve material code wise
cumulation in PR Item level. In PO
> also this cumulation can not
be carried out. So for the same matterial,
> multiple line items
are printed, for which vendors are objecting as it
> increases
their documentation charges. Account assignments are
>
insignificant for the vendors. Its only the material code and Quantity.

>
> Regards
> Mohan.
>
>

---------------Original Message---------------
From: mohan KARUPPIAH
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:07 PM
Subject: Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

For a material that is being inventorised, the demand is available for multiple WBS. MRP provides Purchase Requisition for each WBS separately. Unable to achieve material code wise cumulation in PR Item level. In PO also this cumulation can not be carried out. So for the same matterial, multiple line items are printed, for which vendors are objecting as it increases their documentation charges. Account assignments are insignificant for the vendors. Its only the material code and Quantity.

Regards
Mohan.

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Have you explored the Toolbox.com Marketplace? Learn more and access a free course now.

_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

Posted by BHEL-TRICHY (ABAP)
on Dec 9 at 11:01 PM
For a material that is being inventorised, the demand is available for multiple WBS. MRP provides Purchase Requisition for each WBS separately. Unable to achieve material code wise cumulation in PR Item level. In PO also this cumulation can not be carried out. So for the same matterial, multiple line items are printed, for which vendors are objecting as it increases their documentation charges. Account assignments are insignificant for the vendors. Its only the material code and Quantity.

Regards
Mohan.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: mohan KARUPPIAH
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 11:43 AM
Subject: Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

We want to combine the requirements of Multiple Account Assignment in a Single Purchase Requisition Line Item for a material code identified as "Individual(Q)" in material master. We are in 4.7 Version. System does not allow. We are planning to upgrade to ECC 6.0 EHP 5. Is this provision available in the new version? Please confirm.

Thanks,
mohan

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements

_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] PR Without Classification

Posted by Athaulla
on Dec 9 at 11:46 AM
Can any one tell me the brief procedure how to work with release strategy for pr without classification and what's the difference b/w with and with out classification for PR?
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.

_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Batch Input for Serial Number

Posted by adimilo
on Dec 9 at 7:22 AM
Hi all,

I have to save 64.000 serial number and I need a transaction far make it. I have tried the standard batch-input ( transaction IBIP) but it doesn't work with transaction IQ01, only for IE01.

But with IE01 I can create an equipment but I can't create a serial number.

How can I save 64.000 S/N ? Can you help me?
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Have you explored the Toolbox.com Marketplace? Learn more and access a free course now.

_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

Posted by Deepak K. Mehta
on Dec 9 at 4:40 AM
SAP 4.7 also supports Multiple Account Assignment. It has been doing so since forever. There is no need for an upgrade on this count.

What ECC 6.0 ehp4 allows is Valuated Gr for multiple account assignment. In 4.7, it allows only non-valuated GR.

Regards,
Deepak

---------------Original Message---------------
From: morise morise
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:52 PM
Subject: Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition

Hi,
EEC6.0 has the capability of multiple account assignment when using a service PR or or asset PR. With a material code I am not sure that is feasible since each material has a valuation class. If non valuated Material use account assignment K. Cheers MT

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Deepak K. Mehta
SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast

Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Have you explored the Toolbox.com Marketplace? Learn more and access a free course now.

_.____.__