Posted by
Sap Land
Saturday, 10 December 2011
19:06
Hi, If this is the update of the moving average price of the material, then the stock movement won't help fix your problem. You will have to adjust your MAP via MR21 transaction. Cheers, HT
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Nely Fernandez Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 8:49 PM Subject: GI for Movement Types Hi Folks, We are updating our inventory in the system for 2011. We want to remove inventory value from prior years which is physically seen. The entry should be Retained Earnings. What is the movement type (MIGO) to be use for GI? Where in OBYC the default acct assignment for GL entry RE. Thanks in advance. Regards, Nely | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | ha_tran SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor
Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement Popular White Papers In the Spotlight SAP BusinessObjects: Dashboards and Analytics. Learn more about this Toobox.com Marketplace online course. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
Friday, 9 December 2011
21:00
Hi, We at BEL also faced the same situation. This has been addressed by consolidating the PO lines of same material code in the Output Smartform so that the Vendor will be seeing a single line. While making GR, the qty recvd has to be allocated to individual line, The other way is to use WBS based prodn instead of sale order based in which case the consolidation happens in PR stage itself. Regards Sheshanarayana > > > For a material that is being inventorised, the demand is available for > multiple WBS. MRP provides Purchase Requisition for each WBS separately. > Unable to achieve material code wise cumulation in PR Item level. In PO > also this cumulation can not be carried out. So for the same matterial, > multiple line items are printed, for which vendors are objecting as it > increases their documentation charges. Account assignments are > insignificant for the vendors. Its only the material code and Quantity. > > Regards > Mohan. > >
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: mohan KARUPPIAH Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:07 PM Subject: Multiple Account Assignment in Purchase Requisition For a material that is being inventorised, the demand is available for multiple WBS. MRP provides Purchase Requisition for each WBS separately. Unable to achieve material code wise cumulation in PR Item level. In PO also this cumulation can not be carried out. So for the same matterial, multiple line items are printed, for which vendors are objecting as it increases their documentation charges. Account assignments are insignificant for the vendors. Its only the material code and Quantity. Regards Mohan. | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |