RE:[sap-log-mm] MRP to create Stock Transport Orders

Posted by Sap Land Saturday, 28 May 2011 22:52 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on May 29 at 10:45 AM
Hi,

Can you rephrase your inquiry? When you said "MRP run does not create a stock transport requisition", did it mean only purchase requisition was generated upon MRP run? or did it mean no procurement proposal at all? Did you assign your customized special procurement key to your material at the demand plant? Was it only happening for one particular material? or for all materials to which the same special procurement key was assigned? How was your MRP run?

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: malimr
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 7:54 PM
Subject: MRP to create Stock Transport Orders

Hi,

I have set the Special Procurement Key to 40 but when I run MRP it does not create a stock transport requisition. How do I configure MRP to create Stock Tansport Requisitions as I am planning in one plant but always get the material from another plant which is the central warehouse and want to create the PO as a Stock Transport Order UB.
Thanks
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com Marketplace: Take online training courses in SAP and other specialized areas of business and IT.
_.____.__

RE: [sap-log-mm] Invoice verification - Justifying why this essential to the vendor reconciliation process

Posted by Sap Land 16:32 0 comments

Posted by CasterTroy
on May 28 at 7:53 PM
I guess you are looking for reasons to do Payable Invoice verification. Few points:

1. To make sure that the quantity on the invoice and quantity delivered by vendor matches
2. Also Qty on the PO and qty on invoice and / or qty tested OK (after receipt / delivery) and qty on invoice matches (2-way, 3-way or 4-way matching)
3. Lesser the invoice corrections, better the performance of the vendor
4. If there is difference between the PO price and invoice price, it has to be either posted as Invoice price variance (if price is mutually agreed) or invoice to be corrected by vendor
5. Then there is a difference between material cost and PO price (often referred to as Purchase Price Variance) which is usally relaized during receipt of the material into stores.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: mlindsay
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 6:45 PM
Subject: Invoice verification - Justifying why this essential to the vendor reconciliation process

I am to do a presentation to justify why invoice verification in SAP is critical to the FI and MM process.

I am stuck at the nature and background of the problem
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com Marketplace: Take online training courses in SAP and other specialized areas of business and IT.
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] MRP to create Stock Transport Orders

Posted by Sap Land 16:02 0 comments

Posted by malimr (SAP MM/PP Senior Consultant)
on May 28 at 7:53 PM
Hi,

I have set the Special Procurement Key to 40 but when I run MRP it does not create a stock transport requisition. How do I configure MRP to create Stock Tansport Requisitions as I am planning in one plant but always get the material from another plant which is the central warehouse and want to create the PO as a Stock Transport Order UB.
Thanks
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency.
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Invoice verification - Justifying why this essential to the vendor reconciliation process

Posted by Sap Land 13:25 0 comments

Posted by mlindsay
on May 28 at 6:44 PM
I am to do a presentation to justify why invoice verification in SAP is critical to the FI and MM process.

I am stuck at the nature and background of the problem
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Which response to your Toolbox.com Groups post was the most helpful? Use 'Best Answer' to mark highest quality content.
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] MMPV and MMRV

Posted by Sap Land 02:23 0 comments

Posted by Sivanandhan
on May 28 at 11:06 AM
Hi,

You can change the posting periods as per the month and the T-code is MMPV
once you have changed the posting period
again enter in to OB52-->select-->company code 1000-->change the End period
to 2011 for all.

GR can be done for the current period.

Regards
Sivanandhan.
Hewlett Packard

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Kannan_1983
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 8:29 PM
Subject: MMPV and MMRV

Hi,
It can be done by making " allow posting to previous perioud" in MMRV for
com code.

regards,
KB
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Number range create for raw material coal

Posted by Sap Land 00:17 0 comments

Posted by Satish Ahirkar (BASIS)
on May 28 at 6:43 PM
Dear All,

Please provide the detail me for how to create the number range for coal.


Thanks & Regards,
Satish
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com for iPhone & Android: Ask Questions & Get Answers Anywhere. Download the Free App
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Part II details not showing in MIRO?

Posted by Sap Land Friday, 27 May 2011 23:45 0 comments

Posted by Tiger100 (SAP Job)
on May 28 at 10:24 AM
Hi,

We have made GR with Mvt. Type '103' with a Excise ref. No. 'A' and done '105' with Excise part I No. 'B' and part II have been posted for 'A' and 'B' both. We have selected the 'B' as less quantity has been received than the total quantity in P.O.

When we are trying to post IR in MIRO system is not reflecting the Excise details.

Please suggest asap why excise details are not being reflected and what should be done step by step.

Regards
Nitin
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
_.____.__

RE: [sap-log-mm] MMPV and MMRV

Posted by Sap Land 23:21 0 comments

Posted by ibuttay
on May 28 at 10:22 AM
Try the MMPI transaction code.

Regards

Ivan

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Princess_Stacey
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:29 PM
Subject: MMPV and MMRV

Hi!

Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks!
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] MMPV and MMRV

Posted by Sap Land 16:04 0 comments

Posted by Kannan_1983
on May 27 at 8:28 PM
Hi,
It can be done by making " allow posting to previous perioud" in MMRV for
com code.

regards,
KB

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Princess_Stacey
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:29 PM
Subject: MMPV and MMRV

Hi!

Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks!
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com Marketplace: Take online training courses in SAP and other specialized areas of business and IT.
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] MMPV and MMRV

Posted by Sap Land 15:29 0 comments

Posted by Princess_Stacey
on May 27 at 6:29 PM
Hi!

Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks!
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
_.____.__

RE: [sap-log-mm] Subcontracting PO creation using BAPI

Posted by Sap Land 14:16 0 comments

Posted by Dave Thornburgh (SAP JOAT)
on May 27 at 5:18 PM
Have you tried talking to the developer who created the custom object, to see if the problem might lie in their "adjustments" to the standard object? Or, have you tried using the standard object?

Dave

---------------Original Message---------------
From: woodburnbonniek
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:32 PM
Subject: Subcontracting PO creation using BAPI

I am trying to create an LSMW based on the SAP BAPI ZSVBUS2012->CREATEFROMDATA1. My attempts continually are failing with the message "Not possible to determine any components". There is not a BOM associated with the PO (I have tried where there is a BOM and it still fails). I have populated the component structures PoComponents and PoComponentsX.

Any input/guidance you can give me regarding the following questions would be appreciated:
-will the BAPI work to create subcontracting PO?
-examples of input records where the BAPI created a subcontracting PO with components?
-are there special requirements to get the BAPI to work for the subcontracint PO and compoennts?
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Dave Thornburgh
SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast

Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency.
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Base Unit Of Measure for Consumer products

Posted by Sap Land 08:32 0 comments

Posted by CWM_expert-SAP (product owner)
on May 27 at 11:37 AM
Hi Tmorizane,
The reason is because of potential rounding errors in case ERP has to convert from one unit into the other. because of that, SAP recommends to use as BUom always the unit with the finest granularity which can occur.
So in case for your product only EA, carton , pallet etc is relevant, EA should be fine. If you for example would need a unit "decimalEA" as well, then EA should not be the BUoM.
there is one exception in case you use the SAP-catchweight solution. Having activated this IS-CWM, you can define a second unit for stock keeping and valuation purposes (e.g. LB). Although LB will probably more granular than EA, in this specific situation you should define EA to be the BUoM.

Hope this helps

b.r., juergen

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Tmorizane
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:16 AM
Subject: Base Unit Of Measure for Consumer products

I am considering the Base Unit Of Measure of Consumer product (ex, Shampoo/Conditioner/etc..). I will set BUOM EA (each). But I found the message from this site. Please refer to the following URL. My question, why we can not set EA as Base Unit Of measure for out product?

Reference:
========
<http://sap.ittoolbox.com/documents/units-of-measure-across-logistics-modules-18259>
1. ALWAYS set the base unit of measure for a material to the smallest unit that can be used. That is, don't set it as FT (foot), but set it as IN (inch). Never set EA as base unit for something that can be divided and consumed in smaller quantities.
========
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency.
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] PO order history tab empty and PO cant proceed

Posted by Sap Land 01:05 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on May 27 at 4:05 AM
Hi,

Does it mean that you can't edit the GR-based IV indicator in ME22N transaction?. If this is the case, then you should check in the configuration to see if this field is set as grey out in ME22N transaction.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: mairymano
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:35 AM
Subject: PO order history tab empty and PO cant proceed

Hi All,

I have the same issue that PO history tab showing but empty, there is no GRN
against following PO.
GR based invoice is un-tickk.
Business requirement is to post invoice as advance, before GRN.
now the problem is system does not allow to park invoice or proceed.

--

Best Regards,

Humaira Aslam Chughtai
SAP MM Consultant
ICI Paints, Pakistan
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency.
_.____.__

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Designed by vnbloggers

Hosted by SapLand