Posted by
Sap Land
Saturday 23 July 2011
03:21
As end user, one cannot edit the PO Print out, PO Print out is designed/Set by SAP Consultant, but there can be different options available to end user to user different forms.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Sainul abid Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:35 AM Subject: Editing the PO printout T code 'SMARTFORMS' | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
02:45
ke53 is the correct tcode to display profit centre.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: NISSS Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:30 AM Subject: T-code for profit center display hi you can use the following t code: S_AC0_52000887 S_AC0_52000888 S_ALR_87013326 S_ALR_87013337 Hope this will help you NISSS | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
01:51
Hello Technically you could use a two-way matching as described. In the same time, GR could be done to non-stock material (if the license fees is created as a material) or directly to a cost center (if the license fee is not subject to individual depreciation for instance) It will materialize the reception "in good shape" of the non-stock item. Using or not GR is more a matter of internal process than a technical obligation.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Belle Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:43 AM Subject: Intangible Purchases Hi Expert How do you handle a purchase order that has a intangible purchases (expediting charges, licenses) that you never receive in? It was suggested to to remove the GR from the line and do a 2 way match. What do you suggest Thanks Belle | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
01:19
Hello, I had a similar issue and was only able to solve it thru creation of material description in the missing language. If anybody has a solution, I am interested too (as most suppliers are OK to work with an English description but require foreign languages for terms and conditions).
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Jannik Magelund Madsen Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 4:09 AM Subject: Is it possible to use EN material description on PO for non EN vendors Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to set-up the PO in a way so I use the EN material description, but terms and conditions in another language. To be specific I want my Danish vendors to get PO the terms and conditions in DA, but the PO material description in EN, so I don't need to maintain a DA material description on the material master. The Danish vendors have DA as standard language on the vendor master. Hoping for a quick reply, Thank you, Jannik | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight IBM Helps Clients Exploit the Power of Cloud Computing. Click Here for IBM's Cloud Computing Virtual Briefing Center. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
01:02
Hello, So far I have seen several planned orders or PR lines be grouped in the PO (not the PR) thru the automatic PO creation tcode.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Unknown User Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:44 AM Subject: PR Creation thru MRP Dear All, How can I create multiple line items in a single PR created thru MRP run ? Or is there any way by which multiple planned orders can be converted into one PR ? Thanks in Advance MK | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
00:58
Hello So far I have seen PR unique lines be grouped in the PO thru the automatic PO creation tcode. Based on the selection criteria, it is possible to group the individual PR lines. I am not sure I understand fully your second point. If you want to create PR for a set of materials every other week, for instance, the planning calendar will give you the most detailed way to regroup the demand on a specific week.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Devanshu Bhatia Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 5:31 AM Subject: Is it possible to have multiple line items in single MRP PR ? Hi, I need guidance on the following points on urgent basis: 1. Is it possible to have multiple line items in single PR generated through MRP Run ? Is this possible by creating MRP Groups? 2. The next step thing I want is that PRs for MRP group A, B & C be created in 1st week of the month. D, E & F be created in the second week of the month etc. The scenario that I want to create is that the organization should have 'N' number of MRP controllers and each MRP Controller may have 'M' number of MRP Groups to handle. We also have long term rate contracts for materials. Please respond to the queries or provide references so that the issues may be addressed. Thanks ! | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
00:52
Hello, I had this issue sometimes when running the batch input in background rather than foreground. Not sure if it is a similar problem, or if you have the issue immediately when recording the transaction. If later, have you tried to use an alternate way of using the transaction (an ABAP or an IDoc entry)?
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: TROY Phillips Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:54 PM Subject: LSMW Recording IE05 with LSMW - the screen flows are not the same as when I step through the transaction without LSMW recording. Does anyone know why this is? I have done many LSMW's and this is baffling me. | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
00:04
Hi, I have two threads running at the moment. The other one to delete the output condition records - still ongoing - and this one to prevent to many output conditions based on what is considered a change which despite deselecting everything other than 5 fields in customising still doesn't work. Thanks.
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Logistiker Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 1:57 PM Subject: Field changes to purchase orders Hi Although i have deselected all the fields in customizing I want as no longer required for change in a purchase order, the system still generates the change output regardless. Is there something I have missed? As far as I can tell there is no user exit active here. Regards | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight IBM Helps Clients Exploit the Power of Cloud Computing. Click Here for IBM's Cloud Computing Virtual Briefing Center. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
Friday 22 July 2011
21:46
Can we maintain the customer sales quantity and value target in SAP? Warm regards, Honne Gowda. | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
21:42
T code 'SMARTFORMS'
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: par_2404 Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:09 AM Subject: Editing the PO printout Where do i find the form? | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
19:20
Logistiker - I'm sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but have you removed all of the output condition records which trigger the output? Dave
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Logistiker Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 1:57 PM Subject: Field changes to purchase orders Hi Although i have deselected all the fields in customizing I want as no longer required for change in a purchase order, the system still generates the change output regardless. Is there something I have missed? As far as I can tell there is no user exit active here. Regards | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Dave Thornburgh SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast
Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
12:50
Recording IE05 with LSMW - the screen flows are not the same as when I step through the transaction without LSMW recording. Does anyone know why this is? I have done many LSMW's and this is baffling me. | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
12:03
T-code : ME2N Selection Parameter: WE101 You will get the list of all open purchase order. I hope this will solve your problem. Regards, rahul shrotriya
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: Pax28 Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 1:56 PM Subject: Open purchase orders in SAP Hello everybody I'm having trouble calculating the total open weight amount in all open purchase orders in SAP. Does anyone have a clue how to extract this from SAP. Many thanks in advance for helping, Kind regards Pax28 | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |