Posted by
Sap Land
Saturday, 11 February 2012
20:24
Question from narcing on Feb 11 at 11:44 PM According to SAP Documentation, the GR/IR Clearing Account should have been cleared during Logistics Invoice Verification. Total amount of the PO has been processed in MIRO and there is no price difference. But, upon review of the GR/IR Account thru t-code FAGLL03, the transactions are still in the list of open-items. What could have been the possible cause or causes of that scenario? Any help will be appreciated.
Narcing
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
05:12
Reply from sop57 on Feb 11 at 8:15 AM Hi,
The data is held in table MARC. You will need to write a QUERY to display the stock figures.
Regards,
SOP57
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: bdollarbill
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Stock Transfer Plant Report
We use Migo functions 303 to transfer & 305 to receive into unrestricted stock. I am trying to find a function that will show the total line items that are on transfer to plant(s). I cannot pull any data on MB5T or MB52. I can find data on individual items by entering in the material number. I am trying to find "ALL" material numbers on transfer between plants. We are seeing items on transfer that have not been received into unrestricted stock & we are not getting orders sent out to handle demand in plant when stock in on transfer.
Thanks,
BH |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
05:01
Reply from sop57 on Feb 11 at 8:15 AM Hi,
I do not agree with HT. We have used Schedule Agreements since 1998 and have never encountered the problem you describe. The advantage of SA's is that if the vendor overdelivers (as he is allowd to with items like printing where an allowance of +/- 10% is standard practice) the overdelivery is taken off the next available future schedule release. I would look elsewhere - perhaps the Purchasing Value Key settings or the Additional Data screen on the SA?
Regards,
SOP57
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: TFEwines
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Early Goods Receipt against Schedule Line
Hello All;
We would like the system to allow a GR against a Schedule Line earlier than the scheduled delivery date, without having to maintain the date in ME38. I have read through the related posts and have not found a definitive answer as to how to do this.
I have modified my settings in MIGO to Propose All Items, which does allow MIGO to display the schedule line. But when I try to do the GR, I receive the message "PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 13.000 EA : 10049002 SH10 1800". This is a legitimate hard error for PO's we want to keep in place, but is being displayed in the case of the early receipt as well. The scheduling agreement I am trying to do an early receipt on has sufficient open quantity, so system must be looking again for a schedule line dated today.
Does anyone know if ECC6.0 has any settings to allow an early GR on a schedule line?
Thanks in advance, Terry |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
Friday, 10 February 2012
19:18
Reply from ha_tran on Feb 10 at 10:42 PM Hi,
The consignment PO does not play any role at all in the consignment liability settlement process via MRKO transaction.
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Mindee
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 1:34 PM
Subject: Consignment Settlement Pulls in Wrong Jurisdiction Code
When trying to settle the consignment on a vendor in MRKO, it is pulling in the wrong jurisdiction code. We changed the jurisdiction code at the plant in OX10 and it then pulled in the correct one. The concern we have is for the purchase orders. The buyers want the other code to default to their POs. It seems we can't satisfy both. Any solutions? |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
19:15
Reply from ha_tran on Feb 10 at 10:42 PM Hi,
How was the "hand-over" taking place?. Does it happen by manually changing the purchasing group directly in the PR?
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: smslearn
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:19 PM
Subject: Report for Purchase Group?
Hi,
I am wanted to know when a requisition is created and when it came to site purchase group and from then which queue it moved and so on. For this I want to know the date and time of movement and to whom it is movement.
Any ideas and thoughts how to achieve this?
Thanks. |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
19:13
Reply from ha_tran on Feb 10 at 10:42 PM Hi,
Unfortunately, this is the way how SAP has designed its system.
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: LisaK
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:46 PM
Subject: How to get PIR without material to automatically populate in PO?
When creating a purchase order with material master, the purchase info record nr is automatically selected by the system, based on material no, vendor no, Porg and plant.
When creating a purchase order WITHOUT a material master, the purchase info record nr is NOT automatically selected by the system, even if a relevant info record exists, based on material group, vendor no, porg and plant.
Is it possible to get the info record no to automatically populate in the PO without using a material master, and if yes, how ? |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
14:32
Reply from jocompto on Feb 10 at 5:32 PM I've not come across any either. I've only seen custom implementations using characteristics and classification. We were dealing with both differences between countries (Europe, US, Canada, Mexico) as well as customer specific allergen reporting/handling characteristics.
It got complex when you made an ingredient blend in one country that was shipped to another country for final mixing then either on to a third country or back to the first.
Had similar issue with trying to establish/maintain product batch tracability solution.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Matt Mahoney
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 4:35 PM
Subject: SAP Allergen at the Material Master Level
Is there any documentation on best business practices on handling Allergens within SAP. We currently use a classification within the material master but it would seem in the food industry SAP would have a standard solution. |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
13:36
Question from Matt-SAPQ on Feb 10 at 4:35 PM Is there any documentation on best business practices on handling Allergens within SAP. We currently use a classification within the material master but it would seem in the food industry SAP would have a standard solution.
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
12:25
Reply from Dave Thornburgh on Feb 10 at 3:24 PM VIkas -
The original answer - almost six years ago - was correct. Also, nobody said anything about changing the value - just where to find it.
Dave
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: vikas
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:47 AM
Subject: EKKO fields: AEDAT vs. BEDAT
I dont think that is right. as creation date cant be changed |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
11:47
Question from LisaK on Feb 10 at 2:46 PM When creating a purchase order with material master, the purchase info record nr is automatically selected by the system, based on material no, vendor no, Porg and plant.
When creating a purchase order WITHOUT a material master, the purchase info record nr is NOT automatically selected by the system, even if a relevant info record exists, based on material group, vendor no, porg and plant.
Is it possible to get the info record no to automatically populate in the PO without using a material master, and if yes, how ?
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  | LisaK
Configuration Specialist | | _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
11:36
Reply from Dave Thornburgh on Feb 10 at 2:35 PM Laurens -
Now, you're mixing two concepts together.
MMRV, MMPV, and related stuff deal with the posting periods in MM. F_BKPF_BUP deals with the posting periods in FI. Those are two different concepts altogether. The requirement to have F_BKPF_BUP in MM movement transactions comes from the fact that posting a material doc frequently results in posting an FI doc as well, via a function call (which is why you can't see the authority check in MB1A by scanning the code).
The reason you didn't see it on a trace is likely because the FI period you were posting into was generally open for everyone, so it didn't need to go further and check for the "special" groups of periods that only selected users are allowed to use.
Dave
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: laurens
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 5:53 AM
Subject: MB1A and Object F_BKPF_BUP
Thanks for answering.
F_BKPF_BUP has a relationship with OB52 by the table field Augr which should agree with field BEGRU in object F_BKPF_BUP
But I only find check of periods in MB1A with the fields in transaction MMRV (or MMPV) and the indicator the Allow posting to previous per. |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | _.____.__ |
