Re: [sap-log-mm] Customization of Material Master

Posted by Denise Michaels
on Oct 13 at 2:54 PM
Neither is a good idea. Best practice is for the client to learn to how to use the existing fields to meet their requirements, using the SAP field names. Otherwise the existing help documentation becomes useless, obtaining help from consulting and SAP can become much more difficult, and even costly errors can result because of misunderstandings.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: Krupakar Jayarapu
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:28 AM
Subject: Customization of Material Master

Client wanted to almost complete customization of material master fields and views. Is it good practice to add new 100+fields to material master? Or is it possible to change the material master existing field names to new names? Of course, without touching dependent fields. Or custom software development for material master creation is an alternative?


Copyright © 2011 and message author. 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
Denise Michaels
SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast

Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements


0 Response to "Re: [sap-log-mm] Customization of Material Master"

Post a Comment