Posted by
Sap Land
Friday, 27 May 2011
23:45
Hi,
We have made GR with Mvt. Type '103' with a Excise ref. No. 'A' and done '105' with Excise part I No. 'B' and part II have been posted for 'A' and 'B' both. We have selected the 'B' as less quantity has been received than the total quantity in P.O.
When we are trying to post IR in MIRO system is not reflecting the Excise details.
Please suggest asap why excise details are not being reflected and what should be done step by step.
Regards
Nitin
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
23:21
Try the MMPI transaction code.
Regards
Ivan
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Princess_Stacey
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:29 PM
Subject: MMPV and MMRV
Hi!
Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks! |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
16:04
Hi,
It can be done by making " allow posting to previous perioud" in MMRV for
com code.
regards,
KB
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Princess_Stacey
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:29 PM
Subject: MMPV and MMRV
Hi!
Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks! |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
15:29
Hi!
Does anyone know how can i correct the period? Current period should be 05.2011 but i have changed it to 06.2011, supposedly to post a June 2011 transaction. I cannot change it back to 05.2011. I tried MMPV but still remains at 06.2011. Thanks!
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
14:16
Have you tried talking to the developer who created the custom object, to see if the problem might lie in their "adjustments" to the standard object? Or, have you tried using the standard object?
Dave
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: woodburnbonniek
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:32 PM
Subject: Subcontracting PO creation using BAPI
I am trying to create an LSMW based on the SAP BAPI ZSVBUS2012->CREATEFROMDATA1. My attempts continually are failing with the message "Not possible to determine any components". There is not a BOM associated with the PO (I have tried where there is a BOM and it still fails). I have populated the component structures PoComponents and PoComponentsX.
Any input/guidance you can give me regarding the following questions would be appreciated:
-will the BAPI work to create subcontracting PO?
-examples of input records where the BAPI created a subcontracting PO with components?
-are there special requirements to get the BAPI to work for the subcontracint PO and compoennts? |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  Dave Thornburgh
SAP Logistics Material Management Enthusiast
Contributed 100 posts in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
08:32
Hi Tmorizane,
The reason is because of potential rounding errors in case ERP has to convert from one unit into the other. because of that, SAP recommends to use as BUom always the unit with the finest granularity which can occur.
So in case for your product only EA, carton , pallet etc is relevant, EA should be fine. If you for example would need a unit "decimalEA" as well, then EA should not be the BUoM.
there is one exception in case you use the SAP-catchweight solution. Having activated this IS-CWM, you can define a second unit for stock keeping and valuation purposes (e.g. LB). Although LB will probably more granular than EA, in this specific situation you should define EA to be the BUoM.
Hope this helps
b.r., juergen
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Tmorizane
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:16 AM
Subject: Base Unit Of Measure for Consumer products
I am considering the Base Unit Of Measure of Consumer product (ex, Shampoo/Conditioner/etc..). I will set BUOM EA (each). But I found the message from this site. Please refer to the following URL. My question, why we can not set EA as Base Unit Of measure for out product?
Reference:
========
<http://sap.ittoolbox.com/documents/units-of-measure-across-logistics-modules-18259>
1. ALWAYS set the base unit of measure for a material to the smallest unit that can be used. That is, don't set it as FT (foot), but set it as IN (inch). Never set EA as base unit for something that can be divided and consumed in smaller quantities.
======== |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| | Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency. _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
01:05
Hi,
Does it mean that you can't edit the GR-based IV indicator in ME22N transaction?. If this is the case, then you should check in the configuration to see if this field is set as grey out in ME22N transaction.
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: mairymano
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:35 AM
Subject: PO order history tab empty and PO cant proceed
Hi All,
I have the same issue that PO history tab showing but empty, there is no GRN
against following PO.
GR based invoice is un-tickk.
Business requirement is to post invoice as advance, before GRN.
now the problem is system does not allow to park invoice or proceed.
--
Best Regards,
Humaira Aslam Chughtai
SAP MM Consultant
ICI Paints, Pakistan |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor
Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency. _.____.__ |
