Posted by
Sap Land
Tuesday, 17 May 2011
04:20
Denise This is a very interesting question which in reality requires a little more knowledge of your clients situation, however, I have a few thoughts that I hope will be useful. Your client wishes to simplify MM01, so where is the complexity? Is it that there are too many screens and fields, or is it that there is a high level of product creation? The question of the number of screens is dependent on the functionality required from the SAP implementation. This should have been addressed at the configuration stage so that those screens that do not contribute to the functionality requirements should be suppressed. The same argument applies to fields, although here you can flag fields as mandatory, optional, or suppressed (masked). Certainly using the mandatory setting allows users to pass through screens quickly as the mandatory setting flags only those required fields. The definition of screens and fields can be configured at the article type level (FERT, HAWA, etc.) At any data take on, there must be routines developed to transfer by batch into SAP. These routines can be used at any future time if it is easy to input to a suitable database format for the batch interface. However, if there are frequent product creations indicating a dynamic business environment I would not suggest this method. Materials can be created by copy from another material. Therefore if the customer can define "key" materials to be used as base materials then these could be copied to a new material and MM02 then used to amend the newly copied material before it is activated. This does however require a clear policy on the status fields. It also requires care where you have multiple sales organisations and planning rules. If there are frequent creations of variants of a basic product then look at the use of configurable materials (KMAT). These can be very useful where you are cutting material to specific non-standard lengths, or applying different colour coatings to a basic product. If the creation is for quotations only, then you could treat the KMAT products as "quotation" only products that cannot be sold. Such generic products would simply require a modifications to the various descriptions, but these could be amended at the quotation stage so that there is no need to use MM02 at all. You may find that the product creation under MM01 can be performed by one department with dummy values for certain fields, but then the responsibility passes to other departments to activate their part of the product by amendments to their dummy fields through MM02. I used this method for planning values where the complexity could not be managed by the product creation team and had to be validated by the planners. Again, without knowing the specifics it is difficult to give a definitive answer to what may be a procedural problem rather than a SAP problem. If the SAP implementation is relatively new, then it is normal that MM01 will take an inordinate length of time - from my experience the users find it a real problem at the outset as it will be very slow. However, after a few months the users become accustomed to the screens and develop routines to speed up the process quite significantly. Paul Massey email@removed 07921 850396
| | | ---------------Original Message--------------- From: dklerkx Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 5:57 AM Subject: Does anyone have a simple MM01 (replacing) tool available? Customer wants to simplify input for MM01. | | __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author. Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | | Popular White Papers In the Spotlight _.____.__ |
0 Response to "Re: [sap-log-mm] Does anyone have a simple MM01 (replacing) tool available?"
Post a Comment