Posted by
Sap Land
Friday, 23 December 2011
06:15
Reply from mitchell357 on Dec 23 at 11:17 AM Yes Dave, the custom field is an append to MARA. I'm not certain about where to check for relevance to change documents, but if this is BD52 my custom field is not available within the MATMAS message type. Changes to the field are currently available via the standard 'Display Changes' menu path.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Dave Thornburgh
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: Tracking Material Master Changes to a Customer Defined Field
Mike -
Is the custom field in an append on one of the standard material master tables? Is the data element for your custom field marked as relevant for change documents?
Dave |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |   _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
03:45
Question from Abhijt on Dec 23 at 10:25 AM Dear Experts,
I have below mentioned requirement .
During PR creation ( ME51N ) for a given material code say "A', if economic stock quantity is say 50 nos. ( Main store qty = 30 + on onder qty = 20, i.e. 30+20 = 50 nos ), so if PR is raised for less than 50 qty, error message should appear. IF PR qty is greater than 50 , warning message would be triggered.
Please inform if it is possible through standard system message or any enhancement is required.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhijit
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
Thursday, 22 December 2011
23:22
Question from BHEL-TRICHY on Dec 23 at 7:55 AM I want to selectively enable user based BOM re-explosion in Sub-contracting PO. Is it possible without screen variant? Is there any PO user exit where this flag(BOM re-explosion triggered) can be traced and control can be built-in?
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight Become a blogger at Toolbox.com and share your expertise with the community. Start today.  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
22:35
Reply from ha_tran on Dec 23 at 7:05 AM Hi,
When you created the purchase order for Plant B, was it a standard purchase order? or stock transport order? Which version is your system in? Did you have the same settings in the material masters for both Plant A and B?
Cheers,
HT
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Jimmy
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:47 PM
Subject: Serialized Material Does Not Show Storage Location at Time of Goods Receipt
Hi,
I have created a non-valuated material with a serial profile whereby serial number is required at time of goods receipt, issue and transfer. The material was created for 1 plant (call it plant A) and then extended to plant B - same serial number profile
When I create a purchase order and then subsequent goods receipt for plant A, I am prompted for storage location and serial number.
When I create purchase order and then subsequent goods receipt for plant B, I get the serial number tab but on the where tab, no storage location appears and I receive error message IO306: mvmt type 101 does not currently support serial number mgmt. |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
21:33
Question from Tiger100 on Dec 23 at 12:34 AM Hi,
I have done the configuration for Excise but system is not calculating the Excise duty, automatically.
I have done configuration as Condition type JM01 in tax procedure, assigned value in FV11 and tax code 100% and given the 16% in J1ID.
1) When I make a P.O. it shows me the % of ED JM01 as zero and not 16%.
Then system is reflecting the % of the ED under "Specific" when capturing the Excise Invoice but not the amount.
In J1ID, under "Excise tax Rate" tab there are two columns "Excise Rate" and "Excise Rate Duty". When I give 16% in "Excise rate Duty" column then system is showing me the 16% under the "Excise duty" tab of the Excise item under "Specific" ED.
2) Where I am doing a mistake or what are the steps shall I configure so that.
- ED % should show 16% in P.O. instead of zero
- I give the 16% under "Excise Rate" and it sholuld show me the duty while capturing ED under "Ad Valorem" option?
- System will calculate the Excise duty amount.
Please suggest.
Thanks and Regards
Nitin
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ | In the Spotlight SAP BusinessObjects: Dashboards and Analytics. Learn more about this Toobox.com Marketplace online course.  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
20:42
Question from appasaheb-nagargoje on Dec 22 at 11:45 PM Company is located in India and vendor is located in Germany.
PO is created on 01- Dec. 2010 statistical del. date is 25- dec. 2010. in purchase order.
But vendor is given confirmation that he will dispatch the same material on 31. Dec. 2010. so purchasing officer changed the PO and mention the vendor confirmation date in confirmation tab in item detail. as 31. Dec. 2010.
Then vendor create his bill on 05. January. 2011. and send the material to India by ship, it will take approximate 22 days time to reach India. so it will reach in India on 27 Feb. 2011
and MIGO will done on may be on 27 feb, 28 feb. 2011.
So my requirement is that I want to evaluate vendor delivery performance on vendor's confirmation date(i.e 31. Dec. 2010) and Vendor's bill date(i.e. 05. january. 2011)?
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  _.____.__ |
Posted by
Sap Land
17:37
Reply from Dave Thornburgh on Dec 22 at 8:39 PM Mike -
Is the custom field in an append on one of the standard material master tables? Is the data element for your custom field marked as relevant for change documents?
Dave
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: mitchell357
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:37 PM
Subject: Tracking Material Master Changes to a Customer Defined Field
We have added a 'Z' field to the Material Master maintenance screen. It is possible to view any changes to the material via the path Environment - Display Changes.
However, it is now necessary to monitor the changes more closely to one particular field, which happens to be this customer defined 'Z' field. Is this possible? Ideally, we would send a user an email upon detection of a change to the field contents. One possible hangup is that BD52 does not display my 'Z' field name, so I am thinking that SAP may not support change documents on the customer defined field.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
- Mike |
| Reply to this email to post your response. __.____._ |  _.____.__ |
