Re: [sap-log-mm] Reverse subcontracting

Posted by stonehenge
on Jun 9 at 8:36 AM
Hi Gurus

Using a reverse movement type will not reduce the FG qty in the system. What HT advised in another mail needs to be investigation through the PP route.I did think about 319 Mvt type but it is with IS Retail !

Regards
Anindya

---------------Original Message---------------
From: subham-das
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:53 AM
Subject: Reverse subcontracting

Hi

What you should do is simply use Transaction MIGO with movement type 102. This will reduce partially the quantity of finished products and therefore, increase the quantity of BOM component items. The costs of transportation or 'dismantle' of your product can be settled via the creation of new PO (for services).

__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers

In the Spotlight
Visit IBM's Leveraging IT Services Briefing Center. Register now and learn how to deliver smarter security & resiliency.
_.____.__

0 Response to "Re: [sap-log-mm] Reverse subcontracting"

Post a Comment