RE:[sap-log-mm] No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Posted by Sap Land Sunday, 15 May 2011 15:49 0 comments

Posted by ha_tran (Senior SAP Supply Chain Business Analyst)
on May 15 at 6:49 PM
Hi,

If this is the case, I would suggest you to log an OSS message to SAP for their due investigation as it appears to be a system bug.

Cheers,
HT

---------------Original Message---------------
From: rgarzae
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:48 AM
Subject: No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Hi Gurus,
For our materials the price control is V.
When we extend them we do not input the price, understanding that every reception will update it. That is, the original price is zero.
When we do our first reception (the material will have a price now), the material document is created, the price is updated in the material master, but there is no accounting document associated with the material document.
Subsequent receptions will create FI document with the behavior we are used to. But I've been looking in SAP documentation
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
ha_tran
SAP Logistics Material Management Top Contributor

Contributed the most posts in a group for 3 consecutive months to earn a Gold Achievement
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Toolbox.com for iPhone & Android: Ask Questions & Get Answers Anywhere. Download the Free App
_.____.__

[sap-log-mm] Cyclical counting best practice

Posted by Sap Land 11:25 0 comments

Posted by Reynier
on May 15 at 4:11 PM
My company ( FMCG retail) is currently doing cyclical counting. We have on average 3 counters with the inventory manager responsible for the counting and the updating of the inventory balances. How many articles can be expected to be counted by these employees? We have had Industrial engineers do a survey and have advised that 1 person will be able to count 110 articles a day, thus 330 for the 3. Is this reasonable / too little / too much? We are expected to complete a full cycle in 120 days, with approx 50 000 articles to be covered. What does best practice dictate?
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Delivery Orders for ME38

Posted by Sap Land 09:29 0 comments

Posted by davidjmccarthy
on May 15 at 12:34 PM
Hi

Daily

Thanks

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

---------------Original Message---------------
From: seekishore
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Delivery Orders for ME38

When you are running MRP it is weekly or monthly.


Regards
kishore
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] Delivery Orders for ME38

Posted by Sap Land 08:12 0 comments

Posted by seekishore (SAP MRP Team)
on May 15 at 11:13 AM
When you are running MRP it is weekly or monthly.


Regards
kishore

---------------Original Message---------------
From: davidjmccarthy
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 7:56 AM
Subject: Delivery Orders for ME38

Hi:

I'm trying to setup Inbound Delivery Orders for ME38 Scheduling Agreement Releases.
The way I would like this to work is the following:
1) I create a Supplier release from MRP through ME38
2) I execute manual Inbound Delivery Orders that peg against the ME38 Release:
Example:
If I have 1000 pcs in a weekly bucket in my ME38 and I then create 5 Delivery Orders against my ME38 Scheduling Agreement for 200 pcs each Monday through Friday, when I look at my MD04, I should be seeing my 5 inbound Delivery Orders with their individual quantities, dates and Delivery Order references against the Scheduling Agreement, and no ME38 weekly requirement against the same scheduling agreement, because it has been pegged (consumed) by the inbound Delivery Orders.

Is this possible, and if so, how do I customize the Scheduling Agreement and the Delivery Orders to do so?


I appreciate any input into this,

David
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Have an SAP Question? Ask Your Peers at Toolbox for IT
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Posted by Sap Land 08:03 0 comments

Posted by seekishore (SAP MRP Team)
on May 15 at 11:03 AM
You are getting problem in any single material or in scenario. please confirm.

If it is in one material than please check the cost center for the material

Regards
kishore

---------------Original Message---------------
From: rgarzae
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:48 AM
Subject: No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Hi Gurus,
For our materials the price control is V.
When we extend them we do not input the price, understanding that every reception will update it. That is, the original price is zero.
When we do our first reception (the material will have a price now), the material document is created, the price is updated in the material master, but there is no accounting document associated with the material document.
Subsequent receptions will create FI document with the behavior we are used to. But I've been looking in SAP documentation
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Earn Recognition for Your Contributions at Toolbox for IT. Gain Points for Community Achievements
_.____.__

RE:[sap-log-mm] No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Posted by Sap Land 07:18 0 comments

Toolbox sap-log-mm

Posted by rgarzae
on May 15 at 10:26 AM
First of all… thank you for your responses and sorry for my delay. I was unable to connect.

It is not a non-valuated reception (price would not change). It is not consignment. It is not blocked stock.

Something important is that Material Ledger is activated and working fine in other scenarios..

I have not found any SAP Note regarding this issue.

Your help is appreciated.

---------------Original Message---------------
From: rgarzae
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:48 AM
Subject: No FI Document but quantity a new price calculated correctly Price Control V

Hi Gurus,
For our materials the price control is V.
When we extend them we do not input the price, understanding that every reception will update it. That is, the original price is zero.
When we do our first reception (the material will have a price now), the material document is created, the price is updated in the material master, but there is no accounting document associated with the material document.
Subsequent receptions will create FI document with the behavior we are used to. But I've been looking in SAP documentation
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
Have an SAP Question? Ask Your Peers at Toolbox for IT
_.____.__

Re: [sap-log-mm] Error during MIGO

Posted by Sap Land 06:55 0 comments

Posted by mairymano (Software Engineer)
on May 15 at 10:23 AM
Dear Vikas,

Please check profit center maintained in accounting view and also check the
GL account assigned with valuation class is active

Best Regards,

Humaira Aslam Chughtai
SAP MM Consultant
ICI Paints, Pakistan

---------------Original Message---------------
From: vikassharma6
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 2:42 PM
Subject: Error during MIGO

Dear experts,
i'm facing problem while doing GR through MIGO(Mvt 101)
System is showing an error message "Account determination for entry MBCA GBB not possible"
I've already set the valuation group as 0001 in OMWD but still the problem is persisting.
i would be thankful if someone can provide right approach to me...

Thanks in advance

vikas
__.____._
Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.

Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Mark as helpful
View this online
  
Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight
SAP Enterprise Mobility Webcast Watch today!
_.____.__

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Designed by vnbloggers

Hosted by SapLand